Here you will find common day understanding of certain terms:
Cross dressing is simply wearing clothes that are usually associated with a person of the "opposite" sex or gender. This definition starts to become difficult when one scratches below the surface but it is generally thought to be well understood
This term was coined by Magnus Hirschfeld in 1910 in his book The Transvestites: An
investigation of the Erotic Desire to Cross Dress. Ever since, it has been associated
with fetishism and erotic motivation. This was reinforced by later studies which set out
to categorize people according to the "degree of erotic enjoyment" they
experienced.
There is considerable argument about the use of the word transvestite. Its origins as a
definition of a category of treatment for severely disturbed people give the label an
unpleasant ring for many people who have this label applied to them. Cross-dresser is a
less pejorative term that is acceptable to most people who do not specifically identify as
a transsexual.
The word transsexual was first used by Dr Harry Benjamin to describe a particular type
of cross dresser who wanted to live life in an "opposite gender role" in the
early 1950's. This type of person was distinguished from the class of transvestite by
having no apparent erotic stimulation from cross dressing and this was considered a more
more "worthy" cause than the supposedly sexually "deviant" feelings of
the transvestite.
Transsexuals are often viewed as a separate class of people by comparison with others with
gender variance but may also be seen as another form of expression of an underlying
discomfort with the sex and gender assignment and roles they received in childhood. The
one clearly distinguishable feature that identifies transsexuals is their desire to modify
their bodies with hormones and usually surgical procedures to make their bodies more like
they want them to be.
Cross-living is a less confusing term than Transgenderist which seems that it should
refer to the whole range of variants that make up the category Transgender. Instead, it
made an appearance in the literature as a description of a person who lives in a gender
role that is different to that which is usually associated with their sex. This is a
confusing term and cross-living is a better one that we will use here.
People who cross-live may do so for many different motivations. Many may not be recognized
as actually cross-living and it is clear that this practice has existed for many centuries
and across many different cultures. A person who is cross living may be doing so prior to
any GRS/SRS or as a choice they make without necessarily having any intention of surgical
or hormonal body modification
An Intersexed person is someone who was born in an intermediate state where their body
was neither definitively male nor female. In some cases this is not externally visible and
in others it is. Doctors frequently advise parents to undertake immediate surgical
"correction" to ensure that an infant who is ambiguously sexed is made to
cosmetically resemble either a male or a female.
This practice can cause distress in later life when a person finds that this was done to
them without their consent.
There is a far greater degree of variation in the sex genetic make up than is widely
understood. As well as the XY and XX that are typical male and female, respectively, there
are XXY (47 chromosomes rather than 46) and other anomalies that produce differing degrees
of variance in body development. Approximately 1.7% of people show one of the many forms
of intersex development.
A Gender Outlaw is someone who rejects the standard bipolar view that says that there
are two genders and two sexes, a person must necessarily have their gender identification
match their physical sex.
Those who hold different views are called gender outlaws because they are advocating
something that is counter to the established order. This involves such ideas as not being
either male nor female and perhaps not identifying as either a man or a woman. The
distinguishing factor for these people is that they are actively challenging stereotypes,
often very publicly and politically.
Is it legal?
What about restrooms?
Yes,
for the most part. Aside from statutes involving indecent exposure, there are no
restrictions on what clothing one can wear in the State of Minnesota. Additionally we are
a protected class under the Minnesota Human Rights act. These are the appropriate passages
from Sec.2. Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 363.01, subdivision 45,
[SEXUAL ORIENTATION.]
"Sexual orientation" means having or being perceived as
having an emotional, physical,or sexual attachment to
another person without regard to the sex of that person or
having or being perceived as having an orientation for
such attachment, or having or being perceived as having a
self-image or identity not traditionally associated with
one's biological maleness or femaleness.
and from
Sec.10. Minnesota Statutes 1992, section 363.03, subdivision 3,
[PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS.]
(a) it is an unfair discriminatory practice:
(1) to deny any person the full and equal enjoyment of
the goods, services, facilities, privileges,
advantages, and accommodations of a place of public
accommodation because of race, color, creed, religion,
disability, national origin, sexual orientation, or
sex, . . .
There are additional and similar definitions of unfair discriminatory practices including transgendered persons in the areas of education, employment, credit and transaction involving real property. You should be aware that there is a one year backup on cases involving discrimination. Most establishments will be unaware of this and, in fact, will want very much to be welcoming.
Minneapolis has an ordinance regarding the use of opposite sex restrooms. Its intent was to prevent voyeurism. We are not aware of any prosecutions of transgendered people, however, that does not mean that there haven't been any. The American's with Disabilities Act has been an unforeseen aid to the transgendered community as it has added many unisex restrooms through out the area. You may use one of those. Many restaurants with two single stall restrooms have taken the gender identification off both and offer them for use to either gender. A general rule of thumb is to use the restroom which is appropriate to the gender which you are presenting, use your judgement and if confronted, leave. Another strategy is to ask the server, bartender, sales clerk or information desk where the restroom is. They will tell you and usually give you directions to one or the other. Follow their directions.
You should be aware that we are not attorney's and that this is in no way intended to be legal advice.